<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A SERIOUS &#8212; Comedy Forum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mushinnoshin.com/blog/archives/321/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mushinnoshin.com/blog/archives/321</link>
	<description>"I have nothing to say and I'm saying it" -- John Cage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:26:33 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.mushinnoshin.com/blog/archives/321/comment-page-1#comment-29722</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 22:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mushinnoshin.com/blog/archives/321#comment-29722</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know. I mean I certainly don&#039;t think she&#039;s the only one I could ever love or anything like that, I mean she&#039;s not even the only one I ever *have* loved. The particularness with our situation wasn&#039;t the emotion between us, but that she actually managed to turn me into an outgoing -- and talkative! -- person. 

But just as far as the way people interact -- well if we&#039;re all unique individuals, then I think the pattern of interaction between any two people must also be unique. Of course your &quot;similar enough&quot; qualifier does matter, a guarantee of uniqueness does not guarantee significant-uniqueness.

So could someone else do that to me? Maybe. No one else ever has. But that&#039;s OK, it&#039;s not a particular requirement. It was amazing when I had it though.

But mad scientists discussing love drunk? Not only is it a good combination, I think it sounds like the start of one hell of a party!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know. I mean I certainly don&#8217;t think she&#8217;s the only one I could ever love or anything like that, I mean she&#8217;s not even the only one I ever *have* loved. The particularness with our situation wasn&#8217;t the emotion between us, but that she actually managed to turn me into an outgoing &#8212; and talkative! &#8212; person. </p>
<p>But just as far as the way people interact &#8212; well if we&#8217;re all unique individuals, then I think the pattern of interaction between any two people must also be unique. Of course your &#8220;similar enough&#8221; qualifier does matter, a guarantee of uniqueness does not guarantee significant-uniqueness.</p>
<p>So could someone else do that to me? Maybe. No one else ever has. But that&#8217;s OK, it&#8217;s not a particular requirement. It was amazing when I had it though.</p>
<p>But mad scientists discussing love drunk? Not only is it a good combination, I think it sounds like the start of one hell of a party!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate O'</title>
		<link>http://www.mushinnoshin.com/blog/archives/321/comment-page-1#comment-29718</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate O'</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 20:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mushinnoshin.com/blog/archives/321#comment-29718</guid>
		<description>WOW. There&#039;s some drunk blogging that couldn&#039;t be described as &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mushinnoshin.com/blog/archives/322&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;fun&lt;/a&gt;.&quot; 

I kid! I kid because I care. 

Really, it sucks that you and this chick didn&#039;t hook it up but you know, that part of you DOES still exist, I&#039;m sure of it. Because I swear there are other people in the world who can and will bring out your awesome characteristics -- it&#039;s just the way people work, in my mind. I have long held a hypothesis about interpersonal relationships that they&#039;re all about the subsets of characteristics we activate in each other. Ugh, that&#039;s a horrible sounding way of describing it, but I think you know what I mean, judging from what you wrote about what she brought out in you. 

So what&#039;s my point? The world is huge and there are more people in it than can be fed, so statistically, there will be another people or other people in your life who will have similar enough characteristics to make you feel that way again. 

This is fucking cracking me up. It&#039;s like mad scientists discussing love while drunk, and that&#039;s never a good combination. Or IS it? Mwahahaha!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW. There&#8217;s some drunk blogging that couldn&#8217;t be described as &#8220;<a href="http://www.mushinnoshin.com/blog/archives/322" rel="nofollow">fun</a>.&#8221; </p>
<p>I kid! I kid because I care. </p>
<p>Really, it sucks that you and this chick didn&#8217;t hook it up but you know, that part of you DOES still exist, I&#8217;m sure of it. Because I swear there are other people in the world who can and will bring out your awesome characteristics &#8212; it&#8217;s just the way people work, in my mind. I have long held a hypothesis about interpersonal relationships that they&#8217;re all about the subsets of characteristics we activate in each other. Ugh, that&#8217;s a horrible sounding way of describing it, but I think you know what I mean, judging from what you wrote about what she brought out in you. </p>
<p>So what&#8217;s my point? The world is huge and there are more people in it than can be fed, so statistically, there will be another people or other people in your life who will have similar enough characteristics to make you feel that way again. </p>
<p>This is fucking cracking me up. It&#8217;s like mad scientists discussing love while drunk, and that&#8217;s never a good combination. Or IS it? Mwahahaha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
